Fertility Law Canada™ at D2Law LLP - Sara R. Cohen, LLB.



                                               


                                                      
  • Fertility Law Canada - surrogacy agreements, egg donor agreements, sperm donor agreements, legal parentage
  • Sara R. Cohen
  • Anatoly Dvorkin
  • Fertility Law in Canada
  • Surrogacy Law in Canada
  • Legal Parentage - Declaration of Parentage in Ontario and Second Parent Adoption
  • Egg Donor Law in Canada
  • Sperm Donor Law in Canada
  • Embryo Donation Law in Canada
  • Multi-parent Agreements
  • LGBT Family Building
  • Fertility Law Canada Blog
  • Media, Papers and Selected Speaking Engagements
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
  • Helpful Links - fertility resources
  • Francais
  • Terms of Use

J.C.M. v. A.N.A. - landmark Canadian decision finding frozen sperm constitutes property

5/7/2012

4 Comments

 
The Supreme Court of British Columbia released a landmark fertility law decision where, for the first time, sperm was held to constitute property at law.  You can find the J.C.M. v. A.N.A. decision here.

Briefly, here are the facts of the case:

A lesbian couple purchased sperm from a US sperm bank.  Using this sperm, they conceived two children at Genesis Fertility Centre.  The couple later broke up and divided up the assets of their relationship, but inadvertently failed to come to an agreement about the remaining sperm.  The applicant, J.C.M., later met a new partner and wanted to use the remaining frozen sperm to conceive a child who was biologically related to her previous children.  A.N.A. refused to allow the use and instead asked that the cryopreserved sperm be destroyed.  J.C.M. brought the application seeking a declaration that the sperm was her sole property.

The Honourable Madame Justice Russell ordered that the 13 remaining sperm straws be divided between the parties.

Here is what I had to say about the decision: watch the brief video here

Take home point: while an important decision, I doubt that the issue of whether gametes are property at law is resolved by this decision.  How would the judge have decided had the remaining donor gamete been a single cryopreserved egg that could not be divided? Would the decision have differed had the donor sperm not been purchased by the parties, thereby taking away any meaningful argument from the respondent that treating human gametes as property devalues and commercializes human tissue?
4 Comments
    Picture

    Author

    Sara R. Cohen practices fertility law at Fertility Law Canada™ in Toronto, Canada with clients across the country and beyond.  She loves what she does, and it shows!

    Archives

    February 2020
    October 2016
    May 2016
    December 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    June 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011

    Categories

    All
    2011
    2012
    Abortion
    Age
    Ahra
    Ahrc
    Andre Picard
    Anonymous Donation
    Asrm
    Assisted Human Reproduction Act
    Assisted Human Reproduction Canada
    Blair Commission
    Blessings
    Building Family
    Canadian Medical Association Journal
    Cbc
    Cmaj
    Declaration Of Parentage
    Discrimination
    Donor Insemination
    Donor Sperm
    Egg Bank
    Egg Donation
    Egg Donor
    Embryo Donor
    Embryo Selection
    Ethics
    Federal Budget
    Feminism
    Fertility Law
    Fertility Law Canada
    Frozen Eggs
    Frozen Sperm
    Gamete
    Gender
    Grateful
    Handmaids Tale
    Hope
    Infertility
    Intended Parents
    Isis Regional Fertility Centre
    Ivf
    J.C.M. V. A.N.A.
    Legal Parentage
    Legal Status At The Federal Level Of Assisted Human Reproduction In Canada
    Lgbt
    Margaret Atwood
    Ova
    Parliament Background Paper
    Pgd
    Pratten
    Pride
    Professor Karen Busby
    Property Law
    Repromed
    Semen Regulations
    Sex Selective Abortions
    Shana Tova
    Sperm
    Sperm Bank
    Sperm Donation
    Sperm Donor
    Supreme Court Of Canada
    Supreme Court Of Canada Reference Re Assisted Human Reproduction Act
    Surrogacy
    Surrogacy In Canada
    The World Egg Bank
    Three-person Ivf
    Warawa
    What Is Fertility Law

    RSS Feed

Contact us by email at sara@fertilitylawcanada.com  or phone at 416.907.2189
Photos used under Creative Commons from Sharon & Nikki McCutcheon, juni xu, LGBTQ Portraits Project, jodyfrost, Zdenko Zivkovic, gemmerich, Jon Ovington, Thirteen Of Clubs, nerdcoregirl, Klovovi, aresauburn™, Daquella manera, vchili, gezelle, spoilt.exile, Racchio, Nina Matthews Photography