5/7/2012 4 Comments J.C.M. v. A.N.A. - landmark Canadian decision finding frozen sperm constitutes propertyThe Supreme Court of British Columbia released a landmark fertility law decision where, for the first time, sperm was held to constitute property at law. You can find the J.C.M. v. A.N.A. decision here.
Briefly, here are the facts of the case: A lesbian couple purchased sperm from a US sperm bank. Using this sperm, they conceived two children at Genesis Fertility Centre. The couple later broke up and divided up the assets of their relationship, but inadvertently failed to come to an agreement about the remaining sperm. The applicant, J.C.M., later met a new partner and wanted to use the remaining frozen sperm to conceive a child who was biologically related to her previous children. A.N.A. refused to allow the use and instead asked that the cryopreserved sperm be destroyed. J.C.M. brought the application seeking a declaration that the sperm was her sole property. The Honourable Madame Justice Russell ordered that the 13 remaining sperm straws be divided between the parties. Here is what I had to say about the decision: watch the brief video here Take home point: while an important decision, I doubt that the issue of whether gametes are property at law is resolved by this decision. How would the judge have decided had the remaining donor gamete been a single cryopreserved egg that could not be divided? Would the decision have differed had the donor sperm not been purchased by the parties, thereby taking away any meaningful argument from the respondent that treating human gametes as property devalues and commercializes human tissue?
4 Comments
5/18/2012 10:59:50 pm
Blog is absolutely fantastic! All great information can be helpful in some or the other way. Keep updating the blog,looking forward for more content.
Reply
8/12/2012 10:29:23 pm
I am happy that you did the subject some justice. Not only do you know a great deal about it, you know how to present in a way that people will want to read more.
Reply
9/24/2012 09:06:05 pm
Very informative posts. Good job with this - Brian
Reply
1/19/2013 03:16:38 am
This article is one of the most clever and interesting one I have read for a long time.I'll keep it warm and spread it around.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorSara R. Cohen practices fertility law at Fertility Law Canada™ in Toronto, Canada with clients across the country and beyond. She loves what she does, and it shows! Archives
February 2020
CategoriesAll 2011 2012 Abortion Age Ahra Ahrc Andre Picard Anonymous Donation Asrm Assisted Human Reproduction Act Assisted Human Reproduction Canada Blair Commission Blessings Building Family Canadian Medical Association Journal Cbc Cmaj Declaration Of Parentage Discrimination Donor Insemination Donor Sperm Egg Bank Egg Donation Egg Donor Embryo Donor Embryo Selection Ethics Federal Budget Feminism Fertility Law Fertility Law Canada Frozen Eggs Frozen Sperm Gamete Gender Grateful Handmaids Tale Hope Infertility Intended Parents Isis Regional Fertility Centre Ivf J.C.M. V. A.N.A. Legal Parentage Legal Status At The Federal Level Of Assisted Human Reproduction In Canada Lgbt Margaret Atwood Ova Parliament Background Paper Pgd Pratten Pride Professor Karen Busby Property Law Repromed Semen Regulations Sex Selective Abortions Shana Tova Sperm Sperm Bank Sperm Donation Sperm Donor Supreme Court Of Canada Supreme Court Of Canada Reference Re Assisted Human Reproduction Act Surrogacy Surrogacy In Canada The World Egg Bank Three-person Ivf Warawa What Is Fertility Law |
Contact us by email at [email protected] or phone at 647.696.7189. International clients can contact us by whatsapp at 647.696.7189