Last night, I saw the play Hatched at the Toronto Free Gallery. I had been waiting eagerly for the play to open, ever since first being contacted by the playwright, Claire Burns, reading a draft of the script, and then attending at and speaking at a fundraiser. Hatched is a play about egg donation. It asks important questions: what makes a family? How important is biology? How much of a person is nature vs. nurture? Should parents tell a child born through the use of donor gametes about their conception, and if so, when? What role should a donor play in the life of the child conceived through the use of the donated gametes? Hatched goes a step further, though. It asks questions about the emotional experience of the egg donor. What does the experience mean to an egg donor? Is the donor curious about children born through the use of the donated ova? It explores the emotions of a woman who had donated her eggs in her youth and later ends up suffering from infertility; the only child with a biological link to her that will exist is the child who was conceived with the use of her donated eggs. Because Hatched is a play and is therefore not required to be true to life, there are parts that are a little bit fanciful. An intended parent being able to steal the medical records of an anonymous egg donor seems unlikely. Even more unlikely is the egg donor being the guidance counsellor of the child conceived with the use of the donor eggs. Regardless, I think it's important to explore the issues surrounding egg donation (and other third party reproductive technologies) from all perspectives, and theatre and art are excellent forums for this. My one caveat, though, is that the audience must remember that this is a play, and not the actual experience of the donor. If we look back to Margaret Atwood's The Handmaids Tale, for example, when it comes to reproductive technologies, sometimes fiction has taken the place of reality in making policy which is a dangerous thing. Hatched is playing through the 17th of November. Tickets can be purchased here.
0 Comments
4/5/2012 2 Comments Dear Margaret, it's me, SaraDear Margaret,
It's me, Sara. Like many others, I'm a fan. Loved Alias Grace, The Robber Bride. Enjoyed your poetry. Above all, though, I love The Handmaid's Tale. I remember the first time I read The Handmaid's Tale. I was so affected by the book - the characters, yes, but even more so the ideas, the possibilities, how a society can go so very, very wrong. I'm certain that I have never looked at butter the same way. Since then, I would guess that I have read it at least five more times and it undoubtedly was influential on my chosen and beloved career path - fertility law. As you are no doubt aware, your book is (dis)credited as the basis upon which the Baird Report and the subsequent Asssisted Human Reproduction Act were written. It is therefore in your name that, in ostensibly trying to protect women from being exploited for their reproductive capabilities as were the women in Gilead, the Assisted Human Reproduction Act prohibits paying a surrogate for her services, an egg donor for donating her eggs, or a person for arranging the services of a surrogate mother, whatever that means (including, ideally, a person with specialized training in the relationships between gestational carriers and intended parents). Now, when I read The Handmaid's Tale, I don't see it as a call for the state to protect women from being exploited; rather, I see it as a message about the potential dangers inherent when a state imposes its ethical and moral views on its people in the name of protecting them - which, in my opinion, is exactly what the Assisted Human Reproduction Act has done. So, dear Ms. Atwood, you are so involved with local and national politics and are undoubtedly one of the most influential Canadians of our time - could you please lend your voice to this issue, too? Women are capable of and should be entitled to make decisions about their bodies, including being paid to donate their ova to others who need them to build their family, or being paid to act as a gestational carrier to people who cannot build their family without their help. If women obtain medical advice, independent legal advice and psychological counselling and choose to engage in surrogacy or egg donation, why should the state protect them from themselves when they do not need or want protecting? |
AuthorSara R. Cohen practices fertility law at Fertility Law Canada™ in Toronto, Canada with clients across the country and beyond. She loves what she does, and it shows! Archives
February 2020
CategoriesAll 2011 2012 Abortion Age Ahra Ahrc Andre Picard Anonymous Donation Asrm Assisted Human Reproduction Act Assisted Human Reproduction Canada Blair Commission Blessings Building Family Canadian Medical Association Journal Cbc Cmaj Declaration Of Parentage Discrimination Donor Insemination Donor Sperm Egg Bank Egg Donation Egg Donor Embryo Donor Embryo Selection Ethics Federal Budget Feminism Fertility Law Fertility Law Canada Frozen Eggs Frozen Sperm Gamete Gender Grateful Handmaids Tale Hope Infertility Intended Parents Isis Regional Fertility Centre Ivf J.C.M. V. A.N.A. Legal Parentage Legal Status At The Federal Level Of Assisted Human Reproduction In Canada Lgbt Margaret Atwood Ova Parliament Background Paper Pgd Pratten Pride Professor Karen Busby Property Law Repromed Semen Regulations Sex Selective Abortions Shana Tova Sperm Sperm Bank Sperm Donation Sperm Donor Supreme Court Of Canada Supreme Court Of Canada Reference Re Assisted Human Reproduction Act Surrogacy Surrogacy In Canada The World Egg Bank Three-person Ivf Warawa What Is Fertility Law |
Contact us by email at [email protected] or phone at 647.696.7189. International clients can contact us by whatsapp at 647.696.7189